Legal Opinion

City of Omaha v. Danner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1971No. 37714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The district court found that use of the land and building located at 2602 O Street, Omaha, constituted a public nuisance. It authorized plaintiff City of Omaha to padlock the building for 6 months, enjoining defendants from using the property during the period. It permanently enjoined (1) Artice Danner from using the property for business purposes and (2) other defendants from using the property as long as Danner used it under a tenancy. Danner appeals. He contends: (1) Plaintiff is not a proper party in equity to abate a public nuisance without special damage; (2) there was nonjoinder of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BURKE LUMBER & COAL COMPANY v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State ex rel. Hunter v. The ArahoNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Village of Kenesaw v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Lamey v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Lyons v. BettsNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Shepoka v. KnopikNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Streblow v. Club 180District Court, D. Nebraska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API