Legal Opinion

Monroe City v. Arnold

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1969No. 11300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice.

The plaintiff, Monroe City, commenced these proceedings asking the court to enjoin the defendants from operating a hog ranch within the limits of the municipality. The complaint named Charles L. Arnold as the sole defendant and the other two defendants were brought in during the course of the trial.

The record shows that the premises consisting of two city lots of an area of about two acres were being used to propagate and raise between 200 and 250 pigs. Even though the defendant Charles L. Arnold who was in charge of the operation made some efforts to keep the premises…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Village of Kenesaw v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State Sanitary Authority v. Pacific Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API