Legal Opinion

Brown v. Liberty Clubs, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-793PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

All parties correctly agree that the Consumer Act has no application in a “pure” real estate transaction. However, the determinative issue before us is one of first impression and asks whether R.C. Chapter 1345, the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, is applicable to the personal property or services portion of a “mixed” transaction that also involves the sale of real estate. Since we believe that this issue must be answered in the affirmative, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals below in this respect.

Appellants contend that since personal property was involved in their purchase…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  2. Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hurst v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Richards v. Beecumont VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Chesnut v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API