Legal Opinion

Chesnut v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2006No. 84376PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anthony 0. Calabrese Jr., Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff Randall Chesnut appeals from the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (“Progressive”) on claims for violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act and unjust enrichment. After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we affirm.

I

{¶ 2} On November 11, 2000, Chesnut, who is a Louisiana resident, purchased a used 2000 Saturn SL2 from Ray’s Auto Sales (“Ray’s”) in Youngsville, Louisiana. In July 2000, Progressive, which insured the Saturn when it was driven by its original owner,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Gridley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pilgrim v. Universal Health Card, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Doe v. SexSearch. ComCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Doe v. SexSearch. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API