Legal Opinion

Monsell v. Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1930No. 20295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

E. M. Monsell and George Magnien protested certain tax levies made by the excise board of Tulsa county for the fiscal year beginning July l, 1928, as illegal and excessive. An appeal was taken by pro-, testants from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review.

Protestants present two propositions, i which we will consider in the inverse order of their presentation.

The second proposition is:

“The taxing officials, without any authority of law, arbitrarily added 10 per cent, of the amounts to be received from ⅛ mill state levy, gross production tax, gasoline excise tax and automobile license tax, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Threadgill v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Albrecht v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hines v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Excise Board of Pottawatomie County v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Pickell v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Protest of ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API