Legal Opinion
Power Specialty Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1936No. 164PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The decree appealed from, entered after confirmation of the master’s report, made an award to the appellee of $209,-612.18, with interest and costs. The patent sustained and held infringed in Power Specialty Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co. (D.C.) 27 F.(2d) 928, affirmed (C.C.A.) 31 F.(2d) 1018, was for a steam generating plant, the specific improvement being an economizer. The damages awarded below were made up of damages for sales lost to the plaintiff by the defendant’s installation of 23 infringing economizers. Profits which the appellee would have made had it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Boesch v. GraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dobson v. DornanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dobson v. Hartford Carpet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- E-I-M Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.