Legal Opinion

Wiedle v. Remmel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1975No. 74-464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Appellant propounds three propositions of law for this court’s consideration.

Appellant maintains, in his first proposition of law, that decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, where, as here, he stepped upon a public highway outside a municipal corporation in daylight with an approaching vehicle in clear view and was thereafter struck by such vehicle. We disagree.

Appellant relies upon R. C. 4511.49, which requires, in part:

“Pedestrians shall not step into or upon a public road or highway without looking in both directions to see what is approaching.”

Violation of R,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norris v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wolfe, Admr. v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Leach, Admx. v. NannaOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delong v. Roeder Cartage Co., Inc., Unpublished Decision (4-5-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Henry, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Willie Campbell & Ulysses Campbell, Sr. v. Memphis-Shelby County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API