Flynn v. Judge
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Mary 0. Flynn and others, from part of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 19th day of March, 1910, upon the dismissal of the complaint as to the first and second causes of action by direction of the court at the close of the plaintiffs’ case on a trial at the Kings County Trial Term.
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs’ appeal is from a judgment that dismissed them as to the first and second causes of action. The third cause of action was eliminated by adjustment. A decree of the Surrogate’s Court removed the plaintiffs as executors and trustees of the estate of their father. The defendant for a time was their attorney and counsel. The first cause of action alleges generally defendant’s lack of due care, skill or diligence in the matters submitted to his advice or intrusted to his charge in relation to the administration of the estate. It also specifies instances thereof, and charges that in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RutledgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Vooth v. . McEachenNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- In re the Settlement of the Estate of WellingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Elias v. SchweyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Looff v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dulberg v. MockNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- McGregor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Newhoff v. Rankow, Cohen & Isaac, P. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1980
- In re the Intermediate Accounting of State Street Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- May v. HaightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.