Legal Opinion

United States v. Phu Tan Luong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2008No. Nos. 07-50161, 07-50246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We have jurisdiction to consider the government’s notice of appeal in Case No. 07-50161 because the matter being appealed was civil in nature, and therefore the time for filing an appeal under Rule 4(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure applied. Although the plain language of Rule 4 directs us to consider only whether the “judgment or order appealed from” is entered in a “civil case” or “criminal case,” our precedents dictate that we must engage in a more searching analysis. We have rejected the “conclusory rationale” that merely because a motion is made in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States of America v. James Truesdale Ronald HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Paul Masuru OnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. PlechnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. David T. BraunsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Burgos Amador v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API