Legal Opinion

Halstead v. Minnesota Tribune Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1920No. 21, 952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $8,666.67 for breach of contract of employment. The ease was tried before Molyneux, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the record wholly failed to establish the contract, and a jury which returned a verdict for $8,290. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action by a servant for breach of a contract of employment. Verdict against the master, and an appeal from the order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Unless there was a valid contract of hiring for three years, there could be no recovery. The court instructed the jury that such a contract was conclusively proven. The correctness of 'this instruction is the only question in the case.

Plaintiff, a person of extensive experience in the newspaper business, applied to W. J. Murphy, the sole owner of the defendant, the publisher of the Minneapolis Tribune, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Twine Co. v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ikenberry v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. In Re Petroleum Carriers Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  3. In Re Estate of LeboriusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. LeBorius v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API