Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Middleton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1993No. 36, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The issue presented in this case is whether Maryland Constitution, Article III, § 38, 1 prohibits use of civil contempt to enforce a defaulting parent’s court decreed child support obligation when the accrued arrearages have been reduced to judgment. The answer lies in the historical evolution of § 38 and case law.

I

In Brown v. Brown, 287 Md. 273, 412 A.2d 396 (1980), we considered the purpose of § 38 and of its various amendments to that time. As originally enacted, the Brown Court pointed out, “the provision simply read 'No person shall be imprisoned for debt’ ” and it…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Kirwan v. the DiamondbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Petrini v. PetriniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API