Middleton v. Middleton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
The issue presented in this case is whether Maryland Constitution, Article III, § 38, 1 prohibits use of civil contempt to enforce a defaulting parent’s court decreed child support obligation when the accrued arrearages have been reduced to judgment. The answer lies in the historical evolution of § 38 and case law.
I
In Brown v. Brown, 287 Md. 273, 412 A.2d 396 (1980), we considered the purpose of § 38 and of its various amendments to that time. As originally enacted, the Brown Court pointed out, “the provision simply read 'No person shall be imprisoned for debt’ ” and it…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Kirwan v. the DiamondbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Petrini v. PetriniCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.