State v. Parent
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). He claims that the trial court erred (1) by improper restriction of his right to voir dire prospective jurors, (2) by denying his motions for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, (3) by admitting the testimony of a witness relating to the defendant’s knowledge of the nature of the substance involved, and (4) in the court’s charge to the jury on the issue of possession. We…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. StorlazziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. DumlaoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- State v. AvilaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. ThurmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.