Legal Opinion

Pierse v. Thornton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This suit was brought by the appellee against 'the appellants.. It was to recover money which the appellants, Pierse and Thompson, had collected as attorneys at law for the appellee, and had failed to pay over to her.

The complaint was in two paragraphs. The first charges Specially that the appellee put a note for collection into the-hands of the appellants, that they brought suit on it, obtained judgment for the proper amount, collected the money, but did not pay all of it over to her, and that they had refused and neglected to do so.

The second paragraph is a common count for money had and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walpole's Administrator v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Armstrong v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Black v. HerschIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Judah v. DyottIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  5. Bougher v. ScobeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dodds v. VannoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Eberhart v. ReisterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Terrell v. ButterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Trimble v. PollockIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Newman v. PerrillIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API