Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1833PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action- of assumpsit by Armstrong against Smith. The declaration states, that in consideration that the plaintiff would assign and deliver to the defendant certain accounts for collection, the defendant. promised to endeavour to collect the same, and pay over the money to the plaintiff whenever requested. It states further, that the plaintiff did accordingly'assign over to. the defendant certain notes, and did deliver to him certain accounts, to be collected for the plaintiff’s benefit. It is also stated, that the defendant has collected, on the said notes and accounts, a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StorrsNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Rathbun v. IngalsNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Taylor v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1826

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Heddens v. YoungloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hannum v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. de la Garza v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Pierse v. ThorntonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API