Legal Opinion

Judah v. Dyott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Indebitatus assumpsit by Dyott against Judah, administrator of Brandon-. Two counts: one for goods sold and delivered to the intestate; the other, for money had and received by the intestate to the plaintiff’s use. There was a third count, stating á promise hy the administrator to pay the debt; but to that count a nolle prosequi was afterwards entered. Two pleas; the general issue, and the statute of limitations. Issue on the first plea. Replication to the second plea and issue. Verdict for the plaintiff below. Motion for a new trial overruled; and judgment on the verdict.

The proof was, that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heddens v. YoungloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Hannum v. CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. de la Garza v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Pierse v. ThorntonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Webster Wagon Co. v. Home InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API