Legal Opinion

Dearybury v. New Hampshire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 3, 1971No. 19163PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

This appeal involves the application of the omnibus clause of an automobile liability insurance policy on a state of facts which, in the light of the jury’s verdict as construed by the trial judge, cannot be distinguished from the facts in State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., S. C., 179 S. E. (2d) 203, filed herewith.

The named insured furnished an automobile for the general use of his sixteen-year-old daughter, Gloria, and forbade her to allow anyone else to drive the car. * While on a pleasure ride with her teenage friend, William, she invited him to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Keller v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Pennell v. FosterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API