Legal Opinion

Pennell v. Foster

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1999No. 3075PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge:

This declaratory judgment action was brought to determine which of the captioned insurers provides coverage for injuries sustained by passengers in a one car accident. The trial court found both Penn National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Penn National) and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) to be primary liability carriers, and determined both carriers must defend and indemnify their insureds based on the allegations of negligence of Katherine Foster, the driver. Both Penn National and St. Paul appeal. The remaining named insurers are alleged to provide…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. JulianSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Dearybury v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. Robinson v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Goldston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. HaminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API