Legal Opinion

Marvec-All State, Inc. v. Purcell

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

B. Thomas Pantano, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner, Marvec-All State, Inc., seeks to compel the respondents to award petitioner the contract for the Nassau County Sewer District designated No. 1002-3-B-4 and enjoining respondents from seeking further bids for the project.

On February 23, 1981, the Nassau County Board of Supervisors unanimously passed Resolution No. 130-1981: “APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAU FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LATERAL SEWERS SEWAGE COLLECTION…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McComb v. Town of GreenvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Aetna Casualty. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Marvec-All State, Inc. v. PurcellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API