Legal Opinion

Sambrano v. Mabus

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 8, 2011No. 10-3430PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

Cathleen Sambrano filed with the EEOC a charge accusing her employer, the Department of the Navy, of discriminating on account of race, sex, national origin, age, and disability. When the employer is a federal agency, the EEOC can resolve the grievance and not just mediate, its role for private employment. The EEOC found that Sambrano’s charge is unsupported. Federal employees are entitled to a de novo decision by a federal court, see Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840, 96 S.Ct. 1949, 48 L.Ed.2d 416 (1976), and Sambrano filed a complaint repeating the administrative…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Stanard v. NygrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Antoinette Wonsey v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Chi. Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Celtic Floor Covering, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Dariusz Jaworski v. Master Hand Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Fudali v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. O'Toole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API