Legal Opinion
Fudali v. Napolitano
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 12, 2012No. Nos. 10 C 6744, 10 C 7597PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
A
In October 2010, the plaintiff sued for discrimination by his employer, the Transportation Safety Administration (“TSA”). The TSA answered in May 2011, following certain intervening proceedings. Discovery is scheduled to close in 60 days. The plaintiffs efforts to secure compliance with a rather large number of its discovery requests have proved unsuccessful, and he has moved to compel production of documents and answers to interrogatories. The discovery Mr. Fudali’s counsel has served on the TSA is reasonable in scope…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wimo Labs LLC v. Polyconcept N.A, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Uccardi v. Lazer Spot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Anaya v. BirckDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Black v. FriedrichsenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Grubhub Inc. v. The Kroger Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.