Legal Opinion
O'Toole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 6, 2014No. 11 C 4611PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The plaintiffs have moved for a protective order. [# 179]. That motion is denied for failure to comply with my order of January 29, 2014. [# 176]. The 21/2k page Memorandum Opinion and Order was quite simple and specific. It required, among other things, that as a precondition to any discovery motion, there be a Rule 37.2 conference at which each discovery issue had to be discussed separately. It required the filing of a combined report detailing the parties’ efforts to resolve each issue, including the time spent on each issue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Romane J. Rickels v. City of South Bend, Indiana, Fara P. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Chicago Observer, Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States Freight Company, as Successor in Interest of International Forwarding Co. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Sambrano v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Regional Transportation Authority v. Grumman Flxible Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- W. Bend Mut. Ins. Co. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Sprint Solutions, Inc. v. iCell Guru, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Art Akiane LLC v. Art & SoulWorks LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Art Akiane LLC v. Art & SoulWorks LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Brewer v. PC Connection, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.