State v. Hickle
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This is an appeal by the State from the granting of defendant’s motion to vacate judgment, and the granting of a new trial. Defendant cross-appeals, alleging a new trial would violate his right to be free from double jeopardy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-4031 and 13-4032.
The parties present the following issues on appeal:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in vacating judgment and granting a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence?
2. Would a retrial violate defendant’s double jeopardy rights under the United States and Arizona…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MadsenArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WileyArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HankinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.