Legal Opinion

State v. Hickle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1982No. 5157-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the State from the granting of defendant’s motion to vacate judgment, and the granting of a new trial. Defendant cross-appeals, alleging a new trial would violate his right to be free from double jeopardy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-4031 and 13-4032.

The parties present the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in vacating judgment and granting a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence?

2. Would a retrial violate defendant’s double jeopardy rights under the United States and Arizona…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. MadsenArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WileyArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. HankinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API