Legal Opinion
State v. Ring
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 2001No. CR-97-0428-APPublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1 On December 6, 1996, a jury found Defendant, Timothy Stuart Ring, guilty of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery, burglary, and theft. Defendant was sentenced to-terms of imprisonment for the robbery, burglary, theft, and conspiracy convictions. Because the trial judge sentenced Defendant to death for the murder, direct appeal to this court is automatic. A.R.S. § 13-703.01. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Constitution article VI, § 5.3, A.R.S. § 13^1031, and Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure 31.2.b.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.