Legal Opinion

George and Sachiko Tamura v. United States of America, Ben Tamura v. United States of America, Ken Tamura v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1984No. 83-3849, 83-4192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals from the district court’s order granting appellee taxpayers’ summary judgment motion on the ground that appellees’ expenditures on an onion storage shed qualified for an investment tax credit under Internal Revenue Code section 48. We reverse.

Taxpayers are onion farmers who built a 100 x 100 foot concrete-floored steel storage shed in 1973 and 1974. Onions are stored there during the six month period between harvest and sale. The shed has both standard and garage-sized doors, urethane-coated walls and ceilings, and a ventilation system. Forty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Arne Thirup and Pauline Thirup v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Dillon Ranch Supply, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Munford, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. Watson Land Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Hirl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. McManus v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API