Legal Opinion

Arne Thirup and Pauline Thirup v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1974No. 73-2351PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELY, Circuit Judge:

This is a tax case in which Arne and Pauline Thirup, the appellants, claim a $4,755.41 tax credit pursuant to section 38 of the Internal Revenue Code for investments in greenhouses used in their business of growing and selling cut flowers. After concluding that the greenhouses were “buildings” as that term is used in section 48 of the Code, and therefore ineligible for the investment tax credit, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the Thirups’ claimed credit, and the Tax Court upheld the Commissioner’s decision. Arne Thirup, 59 T.C. 122 (1972). We reverse.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Catron v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  2. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Satrum v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. & Affiliates v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Scott Paper Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API