Legal Opinion
Gomez v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1984No. 81-2409PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal by Defendants American Electric Power Service Corporation, Indiana and Michigan Electric Company, and Franklin Real Estate Company (collectively referred to as AEP)1 of an order of partial summary judgment on a crossclaim for indemnification granted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Viernow v. Euripides Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- James R. Baker v. The Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- R-G Denver, Ltd. v. First City Holdings of Colorado, Inc., Robert H. Goodman, Mortab, Ltd., and First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Firestone Tire And Rubber Company v. Raynal PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.