City of York v. Public Service Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
This is an appeal from an order of the Public Service Commission dismissing a complaint of the City of York against a rate schedule of the York Water Company.
1. Is the order of the commission fixing seven per cent as a proper rate of return upon the fair value of the property of the York Water Company reasonable and in conformity with law? Federal courts have held that federal income taxes may be included in operating expenses. This operates in relief of the stockholders. It enhances their return to the extent of the taxes paid: Galveston Electric Co. v. Galveston, 258…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Erie City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Tulsidas v. Insular Collector of CustomsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bangor Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Newport Home Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Chambersburg Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Clark's Ferry Bridge Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.