Legal Opinion

Glanville v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1920PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Wayne District Court. — PI. K. Evans, Judge. Action for damages consequent on a collision of an automobile -with a railway train, resulted in judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

— Plaintiff, with, her family, had moved from a farm about 8 miles northwest of Lineville to that town in September, 1917, and had taken up her residence on the south side of Mill Street, about iy2 blocks east of the crossing of that street by defendant’s railroad. Through arrangement with her husband, Claude Hesseltine, a boy 18 years old, on October 13th took plaintiff and her husband, with two of her children, in his father’s Ford automobile to the farm to get vegetables they had raised. Shortly after 4 o’clock in the afternoon, they returned by way of and turning south on Washington…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Wagner v. KlosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Freeman v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Beemer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Hines v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Plumb v. Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API