Legal Opinion

57th Street Management Corp. v. Zurich Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant, Zurich Insurance Company, has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff, 57th Street Management Corp., in an underlying negligence action pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, entitled Bade Cab Corp. v 57th St. Mgt. Corp. (index No. 5295/87), the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated March 24, 1993, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Winstead v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Gatesington Equities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Hovdestad v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sorbara Construction Corp. v. AIU InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Nationwide Insurance v. Empire Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Chicago Insurance v. BorsodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Liberty Moving & Storage Co. v. Westport InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Almalabeh v. Chelsea 19 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API