Legal Opinion
Chicago Insurance v. Borsody
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2001No. 00 CIV. 4837(RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Robert P. Borsody (“Borso-dy”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to declare that the plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company (“CIC”) has an obligation under a lawyer’s professional liability insurance policy to defend and indemnify him arising out of an action Allstate Insurance Company, et ano. v. Northfield Medical Center, P.C., et al., Docket No. MRL-L-3228-99, pending in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County (the “Allstate Action”) and in connection with a cross-claim against him asserted by defendant Scott…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mark A. Varrichio and Associates, Mark A. Varrichio, Individually v. Chicago Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP v. Westport Ins. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sirignano v. Chicago InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Cade & Saunders, P.C. v. Chicago InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Great American Insurance Company v. Houlihan Lawrence, IncDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.