Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 11, 1966No. C.D. 2610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The imported merchandise involved under protest 58/7790, entry No. 18863, consists of five Willmes pressers, model 2300/100 S, which are machines designed to extract juice from fruits. Each presser was imported equipped with two electric motors. They were classified under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, dutiable at 13% per centum ad valorem.

The plaintiff claims classification at 13…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API