Legal Opinion

Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 2011No. Nos. A10-1242, A10-1243, A10-1246, A10-1247PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

This appeal rises from the district court’s entry of judgment against appellants, following a jury trial, on negligence claims stemming from an airplane crash and the resulting death of the plane’s pilot and passenger. Appellants challenge the district court’s denial of their motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) and for a new trial. Appellants primarily argue that they are entitled to JMOL because they did not owe decedents a duty of care. We conclude that appellants are not liable, as a matter of law, under respondents’ product-liability theory. We further…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Zinter v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Waugh v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Waugh v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Finn v. Alliance BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API