Scott v. Canton Motor Coach, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.
As a result of a personal injury growing out of an automobile collision, the plaintiff recovered a sizable verdict by the unanimous approval of a jury. Within three days thereafter the defendant moved for a new trial upon seven grounds, as set forth in its motion. Twelve days thereafter and before a hearing was had thereon, it filed a supplemental motion for a new trial and alleged therein an eighth ground, which recited “for misconduct on the part of the juror Robert Kuhn on his voir dire- examination # # # >>
Plaintiff thereupon moved that the supplemental motion be stricken from the files.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. RichterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Cincinnati Trac. Co. v. MastersOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WaldenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Witkowski v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999