Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Myers
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By TERRELL, J.
To decide the question under consideration, we do not find it necessary to consider what transpired in the jury room. We conclude that when juror Harrison, in response to the questions put to him, failed to disclose that he had suffered such personal injuries in an accident, by reason thereof defendant was thereby denied a substantial right, the right to challenge him upon “suspicion of prejudice” or, peremptorily, arid this was misconduct materially affecting defendant’s rights.
The statute, §11419-52 GC, provides the right of a party to challenge a juror “on suspicion of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WaldenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Consolidated Gas & Equipment Company of America v. Clarence F. Carver and La Junta Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Pearson v. Gardner Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Kerby v. HiestermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Maher v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.