Baird v. Havas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiffs being unpaid materialmen who had furnished lumber used by a contractor in the construction of defendants’ home, brought this action to foreclose their mechanic’s lien. The trial court held that the lien was not filed within the time required by law. Plaintiffs appeal.
This case has been before this court on a prior appeal— Baird v. Havas, 65 Cal.App.2d 523 [151 P.2d 10]. That was an appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion under section 663 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment on the ground that the findings of fact were inconsistent and did not support…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stanislaus Lumber Co. v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Nevada County Lumber Co. v. JanissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hubbard v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Baird v. HavasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Publicists Local 818 v. National Screen Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960