Legal Opinion

Baird v. Havas

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1944No. Civ. No. 12662PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J.—

This was an action to foreclose a material-man’s lien. The trial court held that the claim of lien was not filed within the statutory period and gave judgment for the defendants. Plaintiffs took two appeals, one from the judgment, and the other from an order denying their motion to set aside and vacate the judgment and to enter another and different judgment upon the grounds that the conclusions of law were incorrect and erroneous and not consistent with or supported by the findings of fact. (Code Civ. Proc., §663 ; Funk v. Campbell, 15 Cal.2d 250 [100 P.2d 762].) The appeals were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Lumber Co. v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Funk v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eagle Electric Mfg. Co. v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Baird v. HavasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API