Legal Opinion

Cole v. Anciporch

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 4, 1988No. 87-492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*976The complaint sought equitable relief on several theories. In addition, it asked the court to declare that the plaintiff was the sole owner of the disputed land. The defendant, in his answer, asserted, among other things, the Statute of Frauds. He also counterclaimed against the plaintiff for allegedly cutting down his timber on the land in question.

The matter was tried before a Probate Court judge. After the trial, the judge filed a memorandum of decision that contained his findings of fact and conclusions of law. He ordered judgment to enter in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the boundary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tetrault v. BruscoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Davenport v. BroadhurstMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Maywood Builders Supply Co. v. KaplanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Psomos v. TitusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mazzoleni v. CottonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Slade v. SladeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Suga v. MaumMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. AT&T Universal Card Services Corp. v. ReynoldsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API