Legal Opinion

AT&T Universal Card Services Corp. v. Reynolds

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 23, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal by defendant Jeffrey P. Reynolds (“Reynolds”) of a default judgment entered against him pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R, Rule 37(d) for what the trial court termed Reynolds’ “clear and willful violation” of a court order to supplement responses to interrogatories propounded by plaintiff AT&T Universal Card Services Corp. (“AT&T”).

*220The record indicates that on October 11, 1994, AT&T commenced this collection action to recover a $6,571.54 credit card balance allegedly owed by Reynolds, plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs. Reynolds’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Bonnie W. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Gos v. BrownsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Henshaw v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dao Bui v. VazquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. McAndrewsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API