Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Stuckey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1978No. 41608PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrodkey, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a tenant was entitled to harvest crops which he planted on leased farm land before his lease expired, but which had not matured on the date the lease expired, at which time possession of the land was given to a successor tenant. Roy B. Fisher, the tenant, filed this action against Charles S. and Frank R. Stuckey, the landlords, and Douglas Welch, the successor tenant, alleging the defendants had deprived him of his interest in a wheat crop he had planted before his lease expired, by destroying the growing crop shortly after his leasehold terminated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. Village of TerrytownNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Assoc. Financial Services Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Barnes v. MilliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Timmerman v. HertzNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Peterson v. VakNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. ErftmierNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gerald P. And Patricia Andersen v. Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Metropolitan Technical Community College Area v. South Omaha Industrial Park Development Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Schade v. County of CheyenneNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Moudry v. ParkosNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API