Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Eitle, L-06-1247 (6-29-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. L-06-1247Published

1Dissent

{¶ 30} I respectfully dissent from the majority's analysis and disposition of appellant's assignment of error.

{¶ 31} In February 2004, Lance Chaney was identified as an independent witness. He was discovered after he responded to an ad that had been posted by Johnson at a convenience store located near the site of the accident. The ad showed a picture of Johnson's car and requested a reply from anyone who had seen the accident in question.

{¶ 32} On April 21, 2004, the parties took Chaney's deposition. When asked what he recalled seeing, Chaney testified:

{¶ 33} "[Eitle] was going through the —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Green v. Toledo HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Coffey v. Dolgencorp, Inc., 4-06-25 (5-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API