State v. Lundgren
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
Lundgren has presented this court with thirty-two propositions of law concerning both the guilt and sentencing phases of his trial (see Appendix). For the following reasons, we affirm the appeals court’s judgment and uphold Lundgren’s death sentences.
I
The Guilt Phase
With his first proposition of law, Lundgren argues that massive pretrial publicity in Lake County necessitated a change of venue. In May 1990, Lundgren moved to change venue, later filed addendums, and then renewed the motion at the conclusion of voir dire. The trial court rejected any venue change.
Admittedly, the January 1990…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.