Legal Opinion
Earl Nissen v. Churchill County School District Churchill County School Board of Trustees and Robert Quisenberry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1996No. 95-15802Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
86 F.3d 1163
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Earl NISSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHURCHILL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; Churchill County School
Board of Trustees; and Robert Quisenberry,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-15802.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 13, 1996.
Decided May 31, 1996.
Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDU…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.