Legal Opinion

Century Distilling Co. v. Defenbach

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1940No. 6667PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, C. J.

(After making the statement). — Two principal questions are presented which are necessary to be decided in the determination of this case:(1) Was the business done purely interstate or essential to or inseparable from interstate commerce ?(2) If the sales and commerce made were not made and done in interstate commerce, did respondent engage in “doing business” in this state?

For reasons which will hereafter appear, we waive any consideration of the question of the right of respondent to maintain this action and the service of process and other procedural questions.

Preliminary to a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berlowitz v. RoachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wisconsin Fertilizer Asso. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gast v. State, by and Through StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Wasden v. IDAHO STATE BD. OF LAND COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API