Legal Opinion

Berlowitz v. Roach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1947PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRLOW, J.

Respondent Berlowitz was the holder of a retail “Class A” liquor license issued by the city of Hartford, and was engaged in the business of selling and trafficking in intoxicating liquor by operating a retail package-goods liquor*store. Between thirteen and fourteen thousand licensed taverns, package-goods stores, wholesalers, and pharmacies were engaged in selling, dealing, and trafficking in intoxicating liquor in the state of Wisconsin at the time this action was commenced. Each had on hand on July 25, 1947, liquor purchased prior to that date and upon which Wisconsin beverage-tax stamps…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. John F. Jelke Co. v. BeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Douglass v. KoontzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Barry Laboratories, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API