Legal Opinion

Dugan v. Arthurs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 97PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal, No. 97, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1906, No. 371, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Elizabeth Dugan v. Addison E. Arthurs. Before Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Davis, J. The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 97, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Aug. T., 1906, No. 371, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Elizabeth Dugan v. Addison E. Arthurs. Before Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Davis, J. The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. At the trial Joseph Lauer, a witness for plaintiff, was asked this question: “Q. How fast was that automobile traveling, in your judgment, when it passed you going up Highland avenue immediately before this accident happened?” Mr. Dalzell: Objected to as…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

This is an action of trespass brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries which she sustained by a collision with the defendant’s automobile. The defendant was the owner of the machine and, it is alleged, was operating it himself at a dangerous and reckless rate of speed at the time of the accident. He was driving on North Highland avenue in the city of Pitts-burg, and in passing a street car standing at the intersection of the avenue with Hoevler street, the machine struck and severely injured the plaintiff while she was attempting to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. The People v. . GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Walsh v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Finnerty v. DarbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Kotlikoff v. Master, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Wilder v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Wenhold v. O'DeaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API