Legal Opinion

In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1997No. C9-95-812PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

The trial court on stipulated facts adjudicated G.M. delinquent based on actions constituting a controlled-substance crime in the second degree. A panel majority of the court of appeals affirmed the findings and order of the trial court, holding that the evidence was in plain view during a lawful stop and that G.M.’s statements were voluntary. In re Welfare of G.(NMN) M., 542 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.App.1996). G.M. appeals, challenging the denial of his motion to suppress both the evidence seized and his statements, and his adjudication of delinquency. Although we…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API