Caleb & Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*318OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Caleb & Co. and Unit & Co. (collectively, “Caleb”) have moved pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order certifying a class of plaintiffs in this action. Caleb asserts in its complaint that defendants E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. (“DuPont”), First Jersey National Bank (“First Jersey”) and Conoco, Inc. (“Conoco”), violated Rule 14e-1(c), as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and their contractual obligations by delaying payments to Conoco shareholders who tendered shares in exchange for cash in response to DuPont’s tender…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Board of Trustees of Aftra Retirement Fund v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996