Legal Opinion
Davis v. Sun Refining & Marketing Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1996No. 15219PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Presiding Judge.
■Appellant Sun Refining and Marketing Co. (“Sun”) appeals from the judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas finding it liable for breach of contract and fraudulent concealment, ordering it to pay $24,515.23 in compensatory damages to appellees Donald P. Davis and Maxine Davis, and granting the Davises’ demand for specific performance of the contract to remedy the gasoline contamination of a certain parcel of property. Sun also appeals from the trial court’s award of costs and attorney fees to the Davises as punitive damages.
This case centers around a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Glazer v. Lehman Bros IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Donald P. Davis and Maxine Elaine Davis v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Leal v. HoltvogtOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Srail v. RJF International Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.