Legal Opinion

Moura v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1941No. S. F. 16540PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The recommendation of The State Bar that the petitioner be disbarred is challenged by him in this proceeding to review its action. He contends that the penalty imposed upon him is too severe, considering the offense which he committed.

There is no dispute concerning the facts. The petitioner raised the check of a client from $6 to $6,000, cashed it and appropriated the money. He later pleaded guilty to a charge of forgery. Upon a showing that he had made full restitution of the money, the court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for a period of five…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kennedy v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. AlmarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. State Bar of Nevada v. RaffettoNevada Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API