Legal Opinion

State v. Haldiman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2003No. WD 61019PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT ULRICH, Judge.

James E. Haldiman (“Mr. Haldiman”) was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, section 195.202, RSMo 2000, and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. He does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. He makes two claims on appeal, however. Mr. Haldiman asserts that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress and admitting at trial the methamphetamine seized from his person during a pat-down search conducted when he was stopped for a traffic violation that had concluded before the search, and (2) admitting the laboratory…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State of Missouri v. Kenneth BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State of Missouri v. David K. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. State v. BirminghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. CarolloMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API